Saturday, August 29th, 2009 at
11:48 pm
McCain wants to build buildings for alternative energy, he wants to buy bad loans from the American people
he also supports government intervention, and tax cuts for the wealthy.
Can someone explain to me how he is different then Bush and how is he good for the economy?
Tuesday, August 18th, 2009 at
4:53 am
Obama and McCain want change. But the REAL solution to the economy is to get rid of oil and replace it with plug-in-hybrids. People wouldn't pay a gallon at the gas station anymore. It would boom the economy. Why don;t they emphasis the agression of alternative energy?
Thursday, August 6th, 2009 at
11:56 pm
McCain has voted FOR alternative energy MORE than any other Senator---but because he has been in the Senate for 30 years (as opposed to Obama who has even finished one term) he has votes on both sides...OBAMAis lying and mis-characterizing the record.
Tuesday, August 4th, 2009 at
6:54 pm
It is impossible for the economy to pursue both oil and alternative energy. One will phase out the other. So McCain's plan is to Drill, Drill, Drill. Basically he is signaling his support of the Oil companies and their continued dominance.
Sunday, August 2nd, 2009 at
9:57 am
I think this is incredibly important and I am trying to figure out who has a better plan regarding renewable energy.
It seems Obama is more specific about his goals in this area. All I hear from McCain and Palin is about offshore drilling.
What do you think?